REMEMBERING GURUJI
I first met Pandit Pran Nath, or Fakir Pran Nath, or Guruji (as he
was called by his students) in 1970 at the International Airport in
Los Angeles. He was coming in on a flight with La Monte Young
and Marian Zazeela to do some concerts in L.A. and later to
come to San Francisco to stay with me and perform at Mills
College. He was about the first person off the plane, which I was
meeting. I greeted him, and we stood together waiting for La
Monte and Marian to disembark. I remember standing there for
a long time and him being very silent. We went to the
Grinstein's house in Los Angeles where we were staying. Years
later, when Pran Nath would tell this story of our first meeting
to other people, he would always say he came off the plane, but I
didn't recognize him. That used to puzzle me, and I would
always say, "Oh, no, you know I came up and greeted you and we
stood together." Later I came to understand that what he
probably really meant was he recognized me as his student --
possibly even from a former lifetime he recognized me. I think
that was his meaning.
I went to India in September of 1970 to begin studies with Pandit
Pran Nath, Fakir Pran Nath. I had taken initiation with him --
formal initiation, which means becoming a disciple -- the
previous May in San Francisco, and decided to really pursue my
studies in Indian classical music at this time. I arrived in Delhi
during the monsoon. It was pouring rain. His little house in
Kailash Colony had an alley in front which was under about two
feet of water, because of the heavy rains that had been falling. So
I rolled up my pants and carried my suitcases through the water
to get to his house. I waited there all day. He was out teaching
and his family greeted me. Of course, I didn't speak Hindi and
they didn't speak much English. I waited around for him to
come. He finally came that evening quite late and, with hardly a
greeting, walked into the house. I was standing out in the front.
He was never one for too many formalities, especially when he
was younger. Things would just begin with him -- sometimes
with a very important point of business without any kind of
introduction.
His room was a very simple one-room bedroom with a small
single bed on one side, two pictures on the wall (one of
Sarwaswati, the Goddess of Music; another one of Sri Rama
Krishna, the great Bengali saint, to whom he was very devoted),
a small shrine in his closet that would have ordinarily been kept
for clothes (he kept his clothes in his suitcase and hung his
kurtapajama, or his Indian-style clothing, on the back of the
front door). Very spartan: a deck of cards, a couple of books of
holy texts, and that was about it. Very, very few possessions. He
would always say to us, "Many things, many troubles."
Pran Nath always rose very early, between four and five in the
morning, to begin his practice. He was around 51 years old when
I met him, but he still practiced for 4 or 5 hours every morning,
always the same ragas. Just like someone who was polishing
their pots, he went over and over again the details of these fine
ragas. As a student, I would sit with him and observe his practice
-- how he approached the ragas and how he took care of his
voice. He always said, "I take care of my voice like a mother
takes care of her baby." He would only eat certain foods that he
felt were good for his voice, good for his sound. He wasn't a
vegetarian. He liked to eat meat. He felt that meat was needed
for the strength of singing. The first hour or two of the early
morning, while it was still dark, was passed with what is called
"kurage practice," or practicing in the very lowest notes of the
scale. These were notes that I didn't even have in my voice at
that time. But he would practice on these very low tones: C, two
octaves below middle C, was usually the note that he rested on.
He did all kinds of mantras and wasefas (sacred sounds) in the
morning. These slokas -- or holy sayings -- he used to develop
his voice.
Later in the morning, he would start teaching me, giving me a
lesson -- something to work on. At this time, I was an absolute
beginner. He was very patient going over phrases again and
again, so that they would be imprinted on my memory. Then he
brought in a tabla player who would come in to accompany my
lesson. Right away a student started learning to sing with the
rhythmic structure. And that would go on. I would practice with
the tabla player, the lesson that he taught me. He would lay
down with the newspaper, and after that have a little breakfast.
He would usually be gone during the day; he would walk --
many, many miles, or take smoky buses through Delhi -- to go to
the homes of various other students that he had in New Delhi.
He taught at Delhi University at this time also, which was very
far from his home, and he had to get there by bus.
He would often end up walking ten miles a day, just to make all
of his lessons. He wouldn't return until late at evening. He
would call to Mataji, his wife, and she would bring chapatis and
dahl and subzi -- typical food of North India -- to his room. He
would eat either alone or with me or with other students.
At night he liked to listen to concerts on All-India Radio. He'd
lie on his bed with his radio on his stomach. He especially liked
to get the broadcasts from Lahore, which was the city of his birth.
At the time he was born, Lahore was in India, and, after 1947 and
the partition, it became Pakistan. It was more difficult for him to
go there, and he used to feel very, very sad that this land which
he'd grown up in was no longer what it was when he was
young. He said it was like a paradise in those days.
There were two communities with which he associated -- the
musical community and the wrestlers. Often they would be the
same community; many of the musicians liked to wrestle also.
He said every musician would have their own particular spot of
practice -- like under some particular tree in town, or the
outskirts of town. One of his favorite places was the wall of one
of the big mosques, and he would sing there at midnight. He
would sing Malkauns, the raga that's sung at midnight. He said
he would throw his voice up against the wall and hear it
resound back to him.
He spent a lot of his life practicing out of doors. He really liked to
sing standing in the middle of a river. He said the river was
often infested with crocodiles (the Ravi River). He said he would
practice maybe three hours standing there, because it would
develop his abdomen, having the pressure of the water against
it. He had many austere practices. When he practiced at night, he
would tie his hair up against the rafters, so that, if he started to
fall asleep, his head would fall down and jerk against the rope
and wake him up.
When he was studying with his guru -- Ustad Abdul Wahid
Khansahib from Kirana, who was one of the most venerated
masters of his day -- he wasn't allowed to sing in front of his
teacher. So he would go into the jungle at night after serving his
teacher, and do his practice, and then return in the morning to
prepare his teacher's tea and practice. He said many, many years
of serving his teacher like this, he learned to live without sleep.
It was characteristic of his whole life that he very seldom slept
much at night. Just an hour or two here and there, like little
naps.
It was well known that he was born into a rich family in Lahore.
They had a four-story house, they had servants, they had many
animals. The grandfather, who was a very strong personality,
actually had an office where he had many English people
working under him, which was unusual at that time, because,
when he was born, India was being ruled by England.
When he was six years old, he said he liked to put big shades --
big heavy blankets -- over his window, so that he could practice
in the dark during the day, so that the light wouldn't disturb his
concentration on the notes. His grandfather brought in a music
teacher for him, and he began very serious raga study at this age.
He always knew that this was going to be his life. From the
earliest age he was totally immersed in sound. His mother
wanted him to go to school in England and to pursue a law
career, but he decided that he was going to be a musician. They
had an argument, and he was asked to leave home immediately.
He left without any possessions, and started wandering around
India looking for a music teacher.
Pran Nath wandered many years until he found Ustad Abdul
Wahid Khansahib at a music conference. He heard him singing
and knew that this was the man to be his teacher. We asked him
how he knew. He said, at that time he could copy every
musician he had heard, every singer he had heard, but when he
heard Abdul Wahid Khansahib, he couldn't copy this music and
he had to learn how to do it.
Fakir Pran Nath possessed one of the most phenomenal
memories of any musician -- or person -- that I have ever
encountered. He had literally volumes and volumes of poetry
memorized -- committed to memory -- in addition to volumes
of compositions and ragas that he knew. He also knew the
lineages of all the different musicians in the different garanas, or
different styles of music in India. He could trace their histories
back many generations, and knew all the uncles and cousins and
brothers and nephews of these people. If he heard a composition
once, he remembered it. He was much sought after in India from
musicians wanting to learn these compositions. Many great
Indian musicians would come to him to try to increase their
repertoire. He not only knew a lot of compositions, but he
seemed to be a collector of the rarest ones with the most
interesting and beautiful shapes. I think many of these he had
greatly improved by his own phenomenal compositional skills.
He would make a very simple tune into something that was
quite majestic in the way the notes were connected.
He wandered around India a lot as a young man -- wandered on
foot visiting sacred shrines, listening to all of the great masters
that were alive at that time. Up until about 1950, there were
many, many very great singers in India. After that period, the
real old masters died out and the music changed, because the
system of learning music was gradually changing. The old style
of the guru teaching the disciple -- or teaching members of his
family and giving them complete attention -- started dying out,
and students started learning music in schools, and in
universities, and getting less of the kind of attention that this
music needs to be learned, since it's an oral tradition. You have
to be in constant association with a master to really get anywhere
at all.
As he wandered around India, he collected compositions from
many different masters. He was living in Bombay in the house
of Baba Gyani, who was a great film composer -- but a film
composer who composed very serious, very beautiful and deep
music. He had exquisite taste, and loved very much to have Pran
Nath living there because of his purity of style.
Pran Nath also was a student of Pandit Delip Chandra Vedi of
Delhi, who was a great master, and he learned many of Vedi's
compositions. His music was really a mixture of many kinds of
styles, but mainly rooted in the Kirana tradition, which was a
style that began 600 years ago with the great South Indian
musician Gopal Nayak, who moved to Kirana and developed
this style of music. The tradition continued for 600 years. Pran
Nath is the last of the great masters of Kirana.
Pran Nath used to say that his work was about conserving the
pitches of the raga, to make it absolutely pure, so that the effect
was always deep and consistent. And yet, within this purity, his
imagination was vast and endless.
He would sing pitches that didn't seem to exist anywhere, and
yet they were totally convincing and he knew that they were part
of the raga, but they were impossible to copy or to know how to
create them. He was also able to create spaces in time which
seemed to go against the laws of time's passing, in that he would
get many, many more notes into a phrase than should be
allowed to happen in the amount of time allotted to them.
His approach to improvisation was one of total intuition. He
didn't approve of practicing things mechanically, like practicing
all the mechanical rhythmic structures that are very common to
Indian classical music, such as tahais. He would, instead, use
them in his music, but use them spontaneously and always be
adjusting the time according to how he felt it should go. So that
there was always a beautiful, natural unfolding of his music,
always seeming to be free of any kind of system, yet behind it all
was an incredibly worked-out, methodical approach.
He used to say there was such a thing as "uppage." "Uppage" is
when you surpass all of your practices and you're singing freely
and with great imagination without any restrictions. It's like
flying -- like a bird flying. This was the ultimate point to reach.
I can recall the first time sitting with him in Los Angeles in 1970
and being so amazed that someone could create such a vast
amount of colors and emotions with his voice. It was so
powerful to sit right next to him, and have all these frequencies
absorbed into your own body. I had been interested before that in
electronic music -- the different kinds of sounds that could be
done acoustically, and the varieties of timbres that could be
created. When I heard his voice, it seemed like he had been able
to put all of this spectrum of sound his voice. It was like a great
actor who can play any kind of role. Essentially that's what you
have with raga. Ragas are filled with sets of emotions which run
the gamut of human experience. A person has to be a
consummate actor to be convincing and to actually put into
place these emotions in such a way that everyone feels them
very deeply. When he would sing, the raga would manifest in
the walls. So that even after he left the room, you would still be
hearing the raga.
When he wasn't singing, he was often silent for vast periods of
time. He would often chide us for talking too much. All of his
vocal energies seemed to be devoted to making music. But when
he would get into an expansive mood, and start telling stories of
the old days in India, he could captivate everyone with his wit
and charm. He loved a good joke, knew many of them himself,
and often would come up with just the most incredibly
humorous insight into what was going on around him.
When he was younger, he had a complete three-octave, probably
three-octave-plus, range -- very powerful throughout the whole
vocal range. As he got older, and in his last days, his voice was
often reduced to an octave or less, yet he could still create this
same incredible magic with just a few notes. Sometimes there
was a gesture in the voice which was impossible to analyze, and
yet it pointed to everything that should be there. In the last days
of his life, when we would take lessons from him, we had to be
very acutely aware of these gestures, and what he was trying to
point towards. He was the same if he wanted something. Sometimes just by
raising his eyebrows, you had to know what it was that he
wanted you to bring him. A big gesture for him would be to
point at something.
He strongly believed that music should be an offering to God. In
that sense it should have its purest intentions, always have the
musician's deepest concentration, and that the musician should
make this offering as beautiful and pure as he can. And in this
way, he never thought of himself as singing for people. He used
to say many times that, if a musician is saying to himself as he's
singing, "I am singing for other people," then this would be a
second-rate kind of music. But if it's an offering for God, then
it's done with the deepest emotional, mental, spiritual, and
physical perfection.
Pran Nath had a similar respect for his instrument -- the
tambura -- and all musical instruments, and felt that they should
be treated as sacred objects, so that they were always able to give
their most pure and divine voice.
He often told me when we were touring together in Europe,
"First we must go pay our respects to God." So we would go to a
cathedral, if there was one in the town, before we performed. In
India it would be the temple, or the mosque. But always going to
get blessings before you performed was very important to him.
In 1937, at the age of 19, Pran Nath became a recording artist for
All-India radio and began regular monthly broadcasts from New
Delhi. He would come down from Tapkeshwar (the cave where
he was practicing), make his broadcasts, and then go back. By this
time he had completed his apprenticeship with Ustad Abdul
Wahid Khansahib, and was performing at various music
festivals throughout India, becoming recognized for his unique
and deep raga invocations.
Sri Mahent Narayana Giri, a swami from Dehra Dun, came to
one of his concerts and told him that, if he was ever in Dehra Dun,
he should come and visit him at his temple. But he didn't give
him the address. One day when Pran Nath later on was walking
through Paltan Bazaar in Dehra Dun, he happened to see a temple,
and something drew him upstairs. He walked up and there was
the swami who had invited him to visit. Thus began a long
friendship which lasted until Sri Mahent Narayana Giri's death
many years later.
In 1970, my first trip to India, Pran Nath invited me to go with
him to Dehra Dun, to spend several weeks living in the temple
and practicing. Swami Narayana Giri gave him a room, which
was on the very top of the temple. Dehra Dun is right at the
foothills of the Shivalya range, which are the first big mountains
that rise out of the upper plains of India. You can see these
mountains from the roof of the temple. The city of Mussoorie,
which is quite a famous city in India, is situated 7,000 feet above
this temple. From there you can see the lights of Mussoorie at
night. We practiced in this room for many hours each day. I was
given lessons there. During the day when Pran Nath was gone, I
would stay and practice on the roof, with this fantastic view of
Mussoorie and the surrounding mountains. Swami Narayana
Giri would prepare meals for us with his own hands. And there
was a great feeling of love in the temple, between Swami
Narayana Giri and the young children that would come to do
the Arati ceremony at night. He was like a father for them all.
Several times while I was there, as it was the end of the
monsoon season, there were great storms that would rise up.
The little room that we had on the top of the temple didn't have
any windows, so the rain would come crashing in, and we'd
have to try to protect the tambura and our bedding. As it was, I
caught a cold when we were on this trip, and Pran Nath went
out and brought back a little piece of charas (hashish) and said,
"This is good for the cold. You take this." I also think he thought
it was good for the concentration of the music we were studying.
To get deeper into the notes.
When we went to Hardawar (the holy city in the north of India
on the Ganges), along the bathing ghats, there were people
making bhang. We would sometimes drink bhang and then go
sit and sing by the side of the river, the holy Ganges.
Nearby Dehra Dun are the Caves of Tapkeshwar, where Pran
Nath was a naked saint in his youth when he was around 19 or 20.
He became a naga, just clothing his body with ashes and singing
with a community of other sadhus, or young renunciates. The
cave is a beautiful old Shiva cave, which is reputed to be around
5,000 years old. And each year at Shivaratri (which is the night of
Shiva, the full moon in February), devotees would come from
all over India, and Nepal, and the surrounding foothills to have
darshan, in other words receiving the higher physical presence
of someone, and to see this wonderful cave. There's a natural
Shiva lingham in this cave, which is caused by the dripping of
water onto a stone. Lingham is the holy worshipping icon for
the Hindus of Lord Shiva. The cave is quite dark. It has to be lit
by candlelight. Sometimes now they have dim electric light. In
the rainy season it floods because the river rises up and comes
through the cracks, and they have to abandon it during high
water and monsoons.
Pran Nath was always in association with the swamis that lived
in this cave. Throughout his entire life he'd go back -- make a
pilgrimage to the cave and surrounding areas. It played a very
important part in his music practice. I think he developed a lot
of his ideas at this place. Much of his practice and development
of his art was done here.
During the first fifteen years or so that I was a student and
disciple of Pran Nath's, he led a very solitary life and liked to
have a simple routine each day. He saw very few people. People
would come to visit, but for very brief visits. He was mainly
involved with his own practice and his composition. He was a
splendid composer and composed many, many very beautiful
compositions, which he shared with us. He spent long hours
trying to create these compositions -- trying to perfect their
shapes.
As he became older and his health deteriorated, he started
gathering around him more and more students. The last ten
years of his life, there were many people around him day and
night, and a deep bond of love developed between him and his
students.
When he was admitted to the hospital as he frequently was
during the last years of his life, there were always between ten
and twenty students in his room. Many of them would spend
the night, to the bewilderment of the hospital staff who would
usually put up with it. He would be teaching -- giving classes in
his hospital room. Even when he was extremely ill, he would
still try to continue teaching.
At the very end of his life, he was surrounded by these students,
and friends who flew in from India. When he died he was
brought home to his room on California Street. He was laid out
on the floor and anointed with sandalwood oils, dressed in a
fresh kurta, and laid out with many, many flowers. We kept
vigils during the night. Many people would come during the day
to sit and chant. Children would come and dance around him
on the flowers. It was one of the most amazing gatherings I've
ever been to, because people were both sad and joyous. There
was a radiant luster that emanated from his body and his face,
the kind of thing that I had only read about in books. But here
was a living example of it. People felt that he was still with
them. Until the moment of his cremation, his face became more
and more ecstatic, and at the very end his smile became quite
radiant, happy, and childlike.
Pran Nath was a devotee of Shirdi Sai Baba, who was a great
saint of North India who died three weeks before the birth of
Pran Nath. I often wondered if Pran Nath was an incarnation of
Sai Baba. He seemed to resemble him so much, and his ideals
were exactly the same as Baba's. He was neither Hindu nor
Muslim. Sai Baba had turned up mysteriously in the village of
Shirdi as a youth, and started meditating on a garbage heap,
attracting the attention of the villagers because of his serene and
peaceful nature. He later set up in an old abandoned mosque in
Shirdi and kept a constant fire as a vigil. His deeds and teachings
became legendary. He was a Christ-like figure for the Indians.
Pran Nath took us to Shirdi on two occasions, where we would
practice in the village and go to the Hindu ceremonies of fire
known as aratis in the morning and the evening. To the end of
his life, Pran Nath was extremely devoted to Sai Baba. He had
claimed that when he had his severe heart attack in 1977, he fell
into the arms of Sai Baba who had held him until he was
revived after being dead for 13 minutes.
He often said to us that this music was impossible to do without
the blessing of saints. It seemed that to my mind all music was
like this. It was sheer blessing. Music didn't originate with us. It
was a gift. From the saints, from the Divine. Living with Pran
Nath, this was made very apparent in the way inspiration would
come to both him and his students. He made this a living art
that always had to be cherished and protected -- that nothing was
taken for granted, that each day you began seriously anew to
devote yourself to this work and to ask for blessings to try to
create something.
While we were in Shirdi I tried to make a recording of the arati. I
took in a professional cassette recorder and a good microphone,
and stood in the middle of the arati while people were singing
and playing drums and cymbals. There was a great fervor and
emotional moment during the arati when people would wave
torches of fire in front of the statue of Sai Baba. I came back to the
little hut where we were staying near the temple in Shirdi, and
started playing the tape back of the arati, only there was nothing
on the tape. Pandit Pran Nath said, "Only if Baba wants the arati
to be on the tape, it will appear." I was ready to go back the next
night and try to record the arati again, and just before going I put
the tape in again to play. This time there was the arati on the
tape. Apparently Sai Baba had wanted it to be on the tape after
all.
The ride to and from Shirdi from Bombay was really harrowing.
We went in a taxi -- it was La Monte Young, Marian Zazeela,
Pandit Pran Nath, and I. We saw numerous trucks turned over
on the road from accidents, and also on the way back. When we
got back to Bombay, everybody was praising Sai Baba for
delivering us safely. Just at that moment we were rammed from
behind very hard by another car. We all laughed at the irony and
got out of the cab -- hailed another one.
We had made several trips to India after 1970, but they were
aperiodic. Beginning six years ago we began a yearly tour to India
every February, and we would take a class of American and
European students there and make this fantastic connection
with the older students of Pran Nath who were Indian and lived
in Delhi. These classes were, I think, a way for Pran Nath to tie
his previous life in India together with the life he lived in
America for almost 25 years. We would sit, Indian and
American students, together in his classes -- established masters
with very young beginners, all learning together. This was a very
powerful way, I think, for him to set up the continuation of his
work, knowing that, in order for it to be a strong experience and
lasting, it would have to have the help and co-operation of both
the Indian and American students. I think we all learned from
each other.
Pran Nath always said, "The first lesson is the last lesson." He
always began with his "sa," or first note of the scale, and from
there related every other note. All of his lessons began that way.
It was true that even people who had a mastery over this music
had to rekindle that love of the very first note they sang. And
this was the way to do it -- to start each day with this. In his classes in India, many people would come, like Ustad Hafizullah
Khansahib -- the great sarangi master. When he would sit and
listen to Guruji, it appeared he realized that there was something
there for him to learn -- even from the most basic lessons that
would be taught to beginners.
It's like saying that, within this primary note, there's a potential
for all the most intricate and elaborate phrases that can be
wrought from the music. Once the primary note is mastered,
and really listened to deeply, everything can be revealed. Even
though Pran Nath was probably the greatest living singer of his
era, he didn't feel himself above sitting down with absolute
beginners and working with the very first lesson, over and over
again. And in that way he would awaken himself the great
mastery and renew it daily.
Pran Nath's life was extremely difficult; he had to work
extremely hard to achieve what he did. Many musicians were
born into families of other musicians and so for them it was
much easier for them to accept the lineage and the teachings and
be on course right away because of the encouragement from the
family. But since he was discouraged by his family from doing
music, he had to seek out his own teacher without any help,
without any support. Even when he found his teacher, his
teacher didn't accept him for the first six years that he was asking
to become a student, because his teacher was a very stern man.
He said, "What do I need to teach you for? You have no money;
you have nothing to offer me." But his persistence won him the
place in the heart of his teacher, and eventually he was taught by
him. But even after that, his life was one of difficulties. The great
depth of his purity and devotion of his music sometimes put
him into conflict with other musicians who took their music a
little more lightly. I think there was resentment coming from
them. So, in a certain sense, he wasn't given encouragement in
the music community, and he also wasn't one to flatter other
musicians just to get a job or to get a concert. He only did his
work under the most strict conditions that he imposed upon
himself -- that the work always had to remain absolutely pure,
and his devotion to the swaras (or minute tones of each raga)
had to be there for him at all times. He'd never compromise
that.
He always said, "My music is a sad music." I think it expressed
the difficulty. But, through that sadness, he gave the listeners
great joy, because he had suffered for it. He could express sorrow
in a way that made it be consumed by the fire of his own work.
The listener did not have to suffer; he could only enjoy the great
depth that was being expressed.
There were occasionally rare moments when he was very
playful with his music, too, and could show the amazing facility
he had of making games out of musical elements. His rare smile
seemed to light up the whole universe, because it didn't come
very often. The same smile that might happen in his music was
only expressed occasionally in a rare mood. But he had it, and
some of us had the rare occasion to enjoy it.
Around 1984, maybe earlier in '83, he bought a house in
Berkeley. He became a more or less permanent resident of
Berkeley, California. Around this time many other students,
many new students started to come and study. A real
community of music lovers developed around him. It seemed
that he knew that it would take a large community of musicians
to sustain the work that he was doing. He wanted to see it go on
in America, beyond his own life. He even took an American
citizenship in the years just before he died. I think he felt that in
America there was a chance for something great to happen with
the kind of musical idea that he cherished. He felt Americans
were hard workers and serious about the music. He realized that
in India possibly the people were too close to the music to really
appreciate it. I observed this, too, in concerts in India that
sometimes the Indians are a bit nonchalant in their listening to
the music. It is true that here he found an audience whose souls
were starving for the experience of this music. An experience
that he brought to America was one of ancient India -- that
experience of the Vedas, the ancient texts that were developed by
the Richis who lived in the Himalayas many thousand years
ago. That kind of sound was in his voice. The kind of sound
didn't exist anywhere else. He was the sole repository. This
rareness was, I think, picked up immediately by Americans,
especially by La Monte Young, whom we have to thank for having
first recognized it and inviting him to America in 1970.
Pran Nath always encouraged me to do my own composition
and experiments with Western classical music, along with the
pure study of Indian classical music. I think he also felt that
something of this depth could also be assimilated in America
and would be uniquely our own, since it's been transplanted
here. And I think he expected us to look for the synthesis, or the
keys, to bringing this kind of experience together in our own
work.
I think this can only happen through our continued practice,
though, of the music as it was taught to us by him. The synthesis
will be made very naturally through a deeper understanding of
what his music really meant. It has to be brought about through
practice, through contemplation and reflection. There are
examples of this in the work of some of his American disciples
now. It should grow as the years following his lifetime go on.
By Terry Riley
The above article is also
published in hard-copy form by
20TH-CENTURY MUSIC
in the September, 1996 issue.
For more information please write:
20TH-CENTURY MUSIC monthly journal
P.O. Box 2842
San Anselmo, CA 94960
(415) 457-3714
Email: mus20thc@aol.com